Disciplinary Conference

Disciplinary Conferences are one-on-one meetings with a university administrator or a member of the University Hearing Board (UHB).  These conferences are intended to determine whether or not a student has violated university policy and to recommend an appropriate sanction, if necessary.

University Hearing Board-level Disciplinary Conferences (UHB-DCs)
According to Article 18 of the "Code of Student Conduct," a student charged with a disciplinary violation scheduled before the University Hearing Board may elect to have his or her case heard at a Disciplinary Conference instead.

UHB Disciplinary Conferences, called UHB-DCs, are proceedings where there is one Presiding Officer, instead of the panel of University Hearing Board members, who will review the case of the charged student – called the respondent.

In either type of proceeding, a member of the SRR staff will ensure the respondent is afforded all the rights guaranteed by the "Code of Student Conduct" and advise the UHB member(s) on procedural and technical matters.  Additionally, the full range of sanctions including the cancellation of a Housing License Agreement, a suspension, or an expulsion may be imposed in either type of disciplinary proceeding.

The ultimate choice between a University Hearing Board and a UHB-DC is one of personal comfort, whether or not the respondent feels comfortable having the case reviewed by the panel of University Hearing Board members or a sole Presiding Officer.   Some students prefer speaking with several people, having more eyes looking at the case; while others are more comfortable in a smaller setting and appreciate the one-on-one conversation with the Presiding Officer.

The Respondent will be informed of their ability to elect a UHB or a UHB-DC when they receive a Charge Letter for a University Hearing Board-level case.  The Respondent must complete and submit the Election of Action form to the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities by the deadline listed in the Charge Letter.

Should a Respondent fail to submit to submit the Election of Action form, the Respondent will have the case heard before a University Hearing Board.

Back to Top

Low & Mid-level Disciplinary Conferences (DCs)
Low & Mid-level Disciplinary Conferences, called DCs, are scheduled regarding violations of the "Code of Student Conduct" where the potential sanctions do not include cancellation of a Housing License Agreement, suspension, or expulsion. 

Low & Mid-level Disciplinary Conferences are heard by staff members of the Division of Student Affairs, typically from the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities. 

What to Expect:
A Low & Mid-Level Disciplinary Conference is facilitated by a sole Presiding Officer.  Students appearing at a Disciplinary Conference should expect to answer questions regarding the reported violations, the level of the student’s culpability, the student’s decision-making process during the incident, and about how this incident will impact the student in the future. 

Students should maintain a respectful tone when interacting with the Presiding Officer and other individuals who may be present such as witnesses, and ask and answer questions in a complete and concise manner.

Disciplinary Conference proceedings can sometimes take on an air of formality, but students are not expected to come dressed in suits or ties.  Most students wear what they would wear to class or an internship.

The order of a Low & Mid-level Disciplinary Conference is as follows:

  • Introduction to DC proceeding
  • Affirmation to be truthful to the Presiding Officer
  • Statement of Alleged Violation(s) to the Respondent
  • Questioning of Witnesses by the Presiding Officer (if applicable)
  • Respondent statement(s) and questioning by the Presiding Officer
  • Respondent’s clarification statement
  • Closing information regarding notification of decision and appeals process

A student who does not appear for a scheduled Disciplinary Conference may have his or her case heard in his or her absence.

Back to Top

DC deliberations are private and are bifurcated, or split into two parts.

The first question the Presiding Officer considers is whether the respondent violated university policy by finding a student “not in violation” or "in violation" of a provision in the "Code of Student Conduct."

The second question the Presiding Officer considers is what should be the university's response to the student's behavior?   This second question is where the Presiding Officer considers appropriate sanctions for a student who violated University policy.  Sanction recommendations are only made after a finding of “in violation” is determined.

Back to Top

Recordings of Disciplinary Conferences
Disciplinary Conferences are audio recorded. DC deliberations are not recorded. The audio recordings of conferences are accessible to the parties of the Disciplinary Conference and may be reviewed during an appeal. 

A party of the Disciplinary Conference may submit a request, in writing, to the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities in order to receive a copy of the audio recording(s) the DC proceeding.

Back to Top

DC Decisions
Determinations of the Presiding Officer are presented in the form of the Adjudication Report to the Director of the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities or designee.  The Adjudication Report details the Presiding Officer’s finding(s) of fact and, if necessary, sanction recommendations. The Adjudication Report may also include any aggravating or mitigating factors considered by the UHB members in making their decision.

The Director of the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities or designee reviews the decision to ensure the Presiding Officer followed university policy, considered all the facts of the case, and if necessary, recommend appropriate sanctions.

Sanction recommendations are considered by the Director of the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities or designee.

The Parties of the Disciplinary Conference will receive a letter indicating the finding(s) and sanction(s), if any, within a reasonable amount of time from the date of the Disciplinary Conference.  Generally, letters are available within five (5) to ten (10) business days of the Disciplinary Conference.

Parties will be notified by the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities of when the outcome of Disciplinary Conference is available.   When picking up the outcome of a Disciplinary Conference, students can ask any questions he or she may have about the contents of the letter.

Back to Top

Assigned Sanctions
Any sanctions assigned as a result of a violation of the "Code of Student Conduct" must be completed by the deadline(s) listed in the written hearing outcome letter.   Reasonable extensions of sanction deadlines may be granted by the Director of the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities or designee for extenuating circumstances outside a student's control.  Failure to complete a sanction by the listed deadline will result in additional disciplinary or administrative action taken by the university.

Back to Top

Parties may appeal the finding of fact of the Disciplinary Conference as indicated in the "Code of Student Conduct."  Requests for appeal must be submitted in writing to the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities within five (5) business days of the written conference outcome letter.

Appeal requests should be addressed to the Executive Director of Planning & Outreach or designee.  Appeals must be based on new information that is relevant to the case, not presented during the hearing, and that significantly alters the finding of fact. In accordance with the "Code of Student Conduct," appeal requests for any other reason (e.g., the severity of sanction) will not be accepted.

The imposition of sanctions will be deferred during the pendency of appellate proceedings unless, in the judgment of the Vice Provost and Dean of Student Affairs or designee, the continued presence of the student on campus poses a substantial threat to others, to himself or herself, or to the stability and continuance of normal University functions.

For more information regarding appeals, please read Articles 33, Article 34, Article 35, and Article 36 of the "Code of Student Conduct."

Back to Top